Sunday, March 29, 2009


My editors, and my agent, have now read THE GATES, and everybody seems very enthusiastic about it, which is a relief. It's always a bit of a risk taking time out from the books that I know will sell in order to write something that no one may be particularly keen on when it's done. It's also a matter of finding the time, or making the time, to pursue such experiments. I've written before about the demands on a writer's time, of which the actual writing of books is only one, and of how I find writing a book a year as much as I can generally manage.

And yet, and yet . . .

Some years ago, probably around the time that I was touring THE KILLING KIND in the United States, I was asked what I planned to do next. I can remember answering that I wanted to write a strange children's book about a small boy who… well, that remains to be seen, or read. At that point, I'd been thinking about the book for a year, but the problem was that I couldn't quite figure out how to write it. I mean, I knew what it was going to be about, but I really had no idea how I was going to make it work.

Then, perhaps three years ago, I made a start on it. I got three chapters in, and abandoned it, because it just wasn't right. I still have two of those chapters, and they're on my desktop as I write. They're entitled "The Singing Rock" and "The Lady Maresin". Neither of them made it into the finished version of THE GATES. In fact, nothing of those original chapters remains in the book that I eventually wrote.

Part of the problem, I think, was magic. I just didn't want to write a book about magic. There were too many books about magic out there already, and magic gives the author an easy 'out'. How was that done? Well, it was magic. Magic is like playing the joker in a card game. It can be anything that you want it to be, but it's kind of a cheat, and it gets irritating very quickly, which is why there's only one joker in a pack of cards.

So I didn't want to use magic, and I couldn't work out how to write the book that I wanted to write, and anyway there were all of these other books to write, and maybe it wasn't an idea that was ever going to come to fruition, just something that might have been. But it just kept nagging at me, because it was such a lovely idea, and I could almost see the boy who would be at the heart of the novel. He was quirky, and eccentric, and he had a small dog on a leash…

And then, early last year, I had a flash of inspiration. I don't get them very often, as I don't think my mind works in quite that way, but when it came it unlocked the book. What's more interesting than magic? Well, I thought, science. Science is interesting. No, strike that: science is fascinating and, what's more, it's real.

Let's be clear on something here: I'm no scientist. I studied physics in school, and passed it, but not with any flying colours, and subsequently no scientific institutions were knocking on my door desperate to recruit me for their secret projects. But the most jaw-droppingly amazing things that I've read about over the last few years have all come out of the realm of science, and the more I've read about it, the more I've come to realise that I know only a fraction of the things that I should know, and want to know, about the nature of the universe, about quantum physics, about how stuff is put together.

After finishing THE LOVERS, I worked flat out on THE GATES. It was a labour of love. I so wanted to write it, and I didn't care if it was going to be picked up or not. Oh, it would have hurt a bit if it had been rejected by my publishers, but I wouldn't have regretted a moment of the time that I spent writing it. I was able to let my imagination run riot, while at the same time retaining a thread of pure science. At times, it felt like a bit of a balancing act, and I've asked the physics department of my old university to check the science to make sure I haven't mangled some very complicated stuff too much, but I hope that the enthusiasm behind it is communicated to those who read it. We'll see.

So THE GATES is a book that combines quantum physics and, well, Satanism, I suppose. It's littered with odd little footnotes, and the occasional drawing. Some of the footnotes are just little nuggets of information about the universe, while others contain pieces of advice, or short essays on, say, the word "the" as it relates to historical figures. Mostly, they're funny, although I hope that they're kind of curious and interesting as well. The kids who've read it have really loved it but, thankfully, so too have the adults. If THE BOOK OF LOST THINGS was a children's book for adults, then THE GATES is, in a way, an adult book for children. It will probably appear everywhere in time for Halloween.

Now you know, sort of. More to come over the next few weeks and months. As for me, it's back to THE WHISPERERS.

This week John read

Nice To See It, To See It, Nice: The 1970s in Front of the Telly by Brian Viner
The Power of the Dog by Don Winslow

and listened to

Fever Ray by Fever Ray (which is just stunning)


Emily Cross said...

John that sounds amazing, such a great twist involving science, which is the most mysterious thing there is - i can't wait for its release. Please tell me you'll be coming to dublin for its release? *cough* signing *cough*

TomH said...

I haven't so much as a doubt that if you were to derive a piece of work based on a combination of phone directory, apartment house lobby listing and a menu from The Olive Garden, you'd create such a twist on the whole of it that it would become instant best seller.

John Quirk said...

John, in recent books your titles have been two-worders beginning with 'The' - The Reapers, the Lovers... now we have The Gates, with The Whisperers to follow.

Is there a particular reason for this (stepping away from some of the three-word titles of early Parker books)? Is it guidance from Hodder and international publishers re marketing of your books,and readers tastes in general?

Or is it just pure coincidence?

Looking forward to The Lovers. I've been waiting for Parker to delve into this aspect of his family's history since Dark Hollow.


John said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
John said...

I was wondering when someone would ask that. I remember meeting my cousin on the street, around the time of The White Road, and he asked me why so many crime novels used three-word titles beginning with 'The', and I thought, hmmm, he's right, you know. Since then, I suppose I've been quite aware of it, in a lighthearted way.
In the end, the titles are the ones that suit the books. So The Black Angel, even though it's three words, was just the best title for that book, although its working title for a while was The Devil's Pitchfork, which isn't nearly as good. Lately, though, I've just been enjoying working under two-word titles. They seem quite evocative and striking to me . . .

Pierfrancesco said...

hi! I read the all novels of Charlie Parker translated in italian language (from "Every dead thing", in italian "Tutto ciĆ² che muore", at "the unquiet", in italian "Anime morte", "dead souls" litterally), and i'm very great fan. I'm waiting the translation in my language of "the reapers" and "the lovers"!!!
I love the thriller stories and you are my favorite writer :-)

TomH said...

The creation of title must be one of the more difficult tasks in publishing. A near perfect portrait as reject when installed inside of an old worn out frame.

mattburnside said...

John: really looking forward to reading this one.

Now back to writing my crime novel, entitled The Three Words.

Michelle (Red Headed Book Child) said...

I can not tell you how excited I am to read The Gates. Book of Lost Things is one of my very favorite novels. You did a drop by signing of stock at my previous bookstore and I was so excited to meet you.

I hope to see you sign at Once Upon a Crime in Minneapolis, MN in November.

Take care,
Michelle W.
(red headed book child)

Barbara said...

I am terribly depressed, tonight. I miss my new friends, Samuel, Nurd, Boswell, Maria, Tom, and even Wormwood! John, I don't know how to thank you for The Gates, what a ride. It's been less than 24 hours since I finished it and I have recommended it to six people...and this was a book my husband said I wouldn't like because it wasn't about Charlie, Angel, and Louis!!!

Paul Smith said...

I'm impressed by "The Gates", and you even don't know how thankful I am for your hard efforts! Only understand this quite well!